A loser of climate change: Common spruce (Picea abies) is adapted to cool and humid conditions which are projected to prevail in smaller areas of Germany in the future. Water stress can increase the susceptibility of the tree species to pests and storms. (Credit: Tilo Arnold/UFZ)
ScienceDaily, Aug. 18, 2008 — One in five of Germany’s plant species could lose parts of its current range, a study by scientists at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and the French Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine reveals.
Species distributions will be rearranged as a result of climate change; this could have a dramatic impact particularly on the vegetation in south-western and eastern Germany. The researchers have modelled and recorded how the ranges of a total of 845 European plant species will shift under three different future scenarios.
Even moderate climate change and limited land use changes could have an adverse impact on flora, the researchers write in the current edition of Biology Letters. The research shows how important it is to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial level in order to preserve broad biodiversity in plant species.
Sven Pompe and his colleagues from UFZ evaluated the potential impact of climate change on the distribution of 845 European plant species, 550 of which are currently found in Germany. The research team, which included Franz Badeck from PIK, used climate and land use scenarios up to 2080 based on possible temperature increases of 2.2, 2.9 or 3.8 degrees Celsius.
The impacts of climate change will result in local losses of flora. The reduction in the ranges of plants is a general trend, although some central and southern European species move in which were not previously recorded in Germany. The impacts will vary locally, with the greatest reduction in species richness likely to take place in northeastern and southwestern Germany. The effects in the simulations become greater as the temperature increases. With moderate warming of about 2.2 C, about 7% of species will lose more than two-thirds of their current ranges. This increases to 11% at a warming of 2.9 C and 20% at 3.8 C. The fact that the extent of change increases disproportionately to the projected increase in temperature argues in favour of the European Union's stabilization target of 2 C in order to protect biodiversity.
Saarland, Rhineland Palatinate and Hesse and the lowland plains of Brandenburg, Saxony-Anhalt and Saxony could suffer particularly high species losses. In contrast, the researchers expect the number of species in the low mountain ranges of Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Thuringia and Saxony to increase slightly, with some plants moving in. However, for this to happen these species would actually have to reach these areas: climate change could take place too quickly for most plant species to adapt or migrate in line with the shifts in ranges -- polewards or to higher altitudes.
"Many plant species could lose their niches in habitats such as mountains or moors,“ Sven Pompe from UFZ explains. Migrating species from southern Europe could not compensate for these losses in the models. The marsh marigold (Caltha palustris), for example, is one of the losers to climate change. The changes in the environmental conditions in the scenarios will result in this species disappearing locally from the low-lying areas of Brandenburg, Saxony-Anhalt and Saxony. In contrast, the common walnut (Juglans regia), originally introduced north of the Alps by the Romans, would find more areas with suitable conditions and could extend into eastern Germany.
This research was funded by the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) with funds from the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety and as part of the European Union’s ALARM, MACIS and ECOCHANGE research projects. Impacts of climate change on biodiversity are being researched by UFZ and PIK in the joint projects "Protected Areas in Germany under Global Change -- Risks and Policy Options” and ALARM.
Journal reference:
1. Pompe et al. Climate and land use change impacts on plant distributions in Germany. Biology Letters, 2008; 1 (-1): -1 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0231
Adapted from materials provided by Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres.
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres. "Climate Change Threatens One In Five Plant Species In Germany." ScienceDaily 18 August 2008.
Link to article: http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=579549341020421678
Written by fatih al-farahat in
Consequences of warming
Climate Change Threatens One In Five Plant Species In Germany
Links Global Warming
Popular Posts
-
This paper can be reviewed in full through the link. Of particular interest, the scholars prepared their paper on the petroglyphs without b...
-
Trapping carbon dioxide or switching to nuclear power not enough to solve global warming problem, experts say ScienceDaily , July 13, 2009 —...
-
It has been possible in the USA for money to emasculate any regulatory regime. That should bother you. The information coming out of the ...
-
Earth's most prominent rainfall feature creeping northward ScienceDaily , July 1, 2009 — The rain band near the equator that determines...
-
by Andy Coghlan, NewScientist Environment , 20 August 2008 FEELING blue about climate change? Don't despair. Psychologists say they can ...
-
These articles are posted in cryptomundo and include a large number of illustrations that will be well worth perusing once the text has been...
-
Readers, be sure an update your link to the graph of the annual tornado statistics. NOAA appears to be changing things around, perhaps even...
-
The bee story continues with the UK now doing acomplete review of the neonicotinoid situation. It is reminiscent of the foot-dragging tha...
-
Climate change is a hoax...or is IT! By Drew Sheneman/The Star-Ledger December 08, 2009, 11:24AM View f...
-
Journal of Climate , Vol. 20, Issue 21 (Nov. 2007) 5391-5400 , DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI1764.1 The Role of Poleward-Intensifying ...
Blog Archive
-
►
2010
(3220)
- December (224)
- November (402)
- October (532)
- September (548)
- August (403)
- July (399)
- June (196)
- May (96)
- April (96)
- March (86)
- February (101)
- January (137)
-
►
2009
(1837)
- December (344)
- November (203)
- October (160)
- September (172)
- August (125)
- July (195)
- June (131)
- May (69)
- April (73)
- March (90)
- February (150)
- January (125)
-
▼
2008
(535)
- December (57)
- November (16)
- October (79)
- September (39)
- August (69)
- July (67)
- June (38)
- May (43)
- April (53)
- March (42)
- February (14)
- January (18)
Feedjit
this blog learn to you all people in the world to keep our earth
Powered by Blogger.
Post a Comment