Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild
- Chris T. Darimonta,b,1,
- Stephanie M. Carlsonc,
- Michael T. Kinnisond,
- Paul C. Paquete,
- Thomas E. Reimchena and
- Christopher C. Wilmersb
+Author Affiliations
-
Edited by Gretchen C. Daily, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved November 21, 2008 (received for review September 15, 2008)
Abstract
The observable traits of wild populations are continually shaped and reshaped by the environment and numerous agents of natural selection, including predators. In stark contrast with most predators, humans now typically exploit high proportions of prey populations and target large, reproductive-aged adults. Consequently, organisms subject to consistent and strong ‘harvest selection’ by fishers, hunters, and plant harvesters may be expected to show particularly rapid and dramatic changes in phenotype. However, a comparison of the rate at which phenotypic changes in exploited taxa occurs relative to other systems has never been undertaken. Here, we show that average phenotypic changes in 40 human-harvested systems are much more rapid than changes reported in studies examining not only natural (n = 20 systems) but also other human-driven (n = 25 systems) perturbations in the wild, outpacing them by >300% and 50%, respectively. Accordingly, harvested organisms show some of the most abrupt trait changes ever observed in wild populations, providing a new appreciation for how fast phenotypes are capable of changing. These changes, which include average declines of almost 20% in size-related traits and shifts in life history traits of nearly 25%, are most rapid in commercially exploited systems and, thus, have profound conservation and economic implications. Specifically, the widespread potential for transitively rapid and large effects on size- or life history-mediated ecological dynamics might imperil populations, industries, and ecosystems.
Footnotes
- 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: darimont@ucsc.edu
-
Author contributions: C.T.D., M.T.K., P.C.P., and T.E.R. designed research; C.T.D., S.M.C., and C.C.W. performed research; C.T.D., S.M.C., and C.C.W. analyzed data; and C.T.D., S.M.C., M.T.K., P.C.P., T.E.R., and C.C.W. wrote the paper.
-
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
- © 2009 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
Post a Comment