Written by fatih al-farahat in


Toxic Pirates





The only thing that should be surprising is that anyone should be surprised.  The last thing a shipper should do is release a hazardous cargo to a third party shipper with no questions both asked and properly confirmed and audited before and after.  And if that shipper fails to make an insurance claim, then who is going to investigate?

The truth is that hazardous waste is best stored in the bottom of the sea, so in the end little harm is usually done.  In fact most indirect nuclear waste is likely best dumped to start with.  That is not true for actual fuels, but those are also subject to profitable reprocessing.

At the moment it is unregulated and regulation as exists on land has created the need for pirate disposal.  Thus we have pirates.

I personally have a lot of respect for the sea’s ability to reduce whatever man chooses to throw into the drink.  Of course, I would also like to have a book of scientific work describing what we know so that the dumping can be signed off on in good faith.

Poisoned Shipments: Are Strange, Illicit Sinkings Making the Mediterranean Toxic?

Accusations fly over criminal dumping and scuttling of cargo ships carrying industrial and radioactive waste

By Madhusree Mukerjee   

 http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=poisoned-shipments-criminal-waste-disposal&sc=DD_20100129

http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/poisoned-shipments_1.jpg


BEACHED; The cargo ship Rosso, which ran aground near Amantea, Italy, in December 1990, may have contained radioactive waste that was dumped at sea. The bright red hull is the result of a repainting job after stranding, perhaps done to hide markings.
COURTESY OF LEGAMBIENTE

In October 2009 the government of Italy announced that a wreck discovered off the southwestern tip of the country is theCatania, a passenger vessel sunk during World War I—and not the Cunski, a cargo ship loaded with radioactive waste, as alleged by district authorities from nearby Calabria. Few locals are reassured, says Michael Leonardi of the University of Calabria. He and others maintain that the putative Cunski is still out there and is just one of numerous ships full of poisonous garbage that a crime syndicate has scuttled in the Mediterranean Sea. Such a startling allegation, if true, would not only damage the tourism and fishing industries along this idyllic coast but also compromise the health of Mediterranean residents.

Processing and safely storing waste from the chemical, pharmaceutical and other industries can cost hundreds, even thousands, of dollars per ton—which makes illegal disposal highly profitable. According to the Italian environmental organization Legambiente, some waste shippers that have operational bases in southern Italy have been using the Mediterranean as a dump. While acknowledging that “no wreck has yet been found that contains toxic or radioactive waste,” physicist Massimo Scalia of the University of Rome, La Sapienza, who has chaired two parliamentary commissions on illegal waste disposal, argues that other vidence makes their existence “beyond reasonable doubt.”
Scalia contends that 39 ships were wrecked under questionable circumstances between 1979 and 1995 alone; in every case, he adds, the crew abandoned the ship long before it sank. An average of two ships per year suspiciously disappeared in the Mediterranean during the 1980s and early 1990s, according to Legambiente—and the number has increased to nine wrecks per year since 1995. Paolo Gerbaudo of the Italian daily il Manifesto, who is assisting investigations, has identified 74 suspect wrecks of which he regards 20 as being extremely suspicious. (The record extends until 2001.)

One notable example of a dubious wrecking is the Jolly Rosso, which washed up in December 1990 near the town of Amantea, after what investigators believe was a botched attempt to scuttle it. The cargo was offloaded and allegedly buried on land. In October 2009 an environmental ministry report noted that district authorities detected dangerous substances in a nearby river valley, including a buried concrete block containing mercury, cobalt, selenium and thallium at very high concentrations—and displaying substantial radioactivity indicative of synthetic radionuclides. Authorities also found marble granules mixed in with thousands of cubic meters of earth, which was contaminated with heavy metals and cesium 137, typically a waste product of nuclear reactors. The assemblage suggests that the Jolly Rosso’s cargo included radioactive waste, sealed in concrete and shielded from detection by marble dust (which absorbs radioactivity).

Significantly, the increase in the frequency of wrecking correlates with the progressive tightening of international dumping regulations. The first suspect sinking, in 1979, occurred the year after the Barcelona Convention, which restricts the disposal of pollutants in the Mediterranean Sea, came into force. Over the following decades other treaties expanded the regulations, culminating in a 1993 amendment to the London Dumping Convention that halted the ocean disposal of all radioactive waste and in a 1995 amendment to the Basel Convention that banned the deposition of the industrial world’s lethal excreta in developing countries. The laws ruined the ambitious plans of one firm, Oceanic Disposal Management, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, to drop tens of thousands of cubic meters of radioactive waste into the seabed off the African coast. Andreas Bernstorff, who formerly headed a Greenpeace campaign against the trade in toxic waste, reports that the number of schemes to ship such garbage to Africa fell steeply at this time, to at most one attempt per year. The drop coincides with a sudden and ominous rise in the frequency with which ships in the Mediterranean perished.