NSIDC Report of August 18, 2009: A change in ice motion slows seasonal decline

NSIDC Report of August 18, 2009: A change in ice motion slows seasonal decline

During the first half of August 2009, Arctic ice extent declined more slowly than during the same period in 2007 and 2008. The slower decline is primarily due to a recent atmospheric circulation pattern, which transported ice toward the Siberian coast and discouraged export of ice out of the Arctic Ocean. It is now unlikely that 2009 will see a record low extent, but the minimum summer ice extent will still be much lower than the 1979 to 2000 average.

Note: This mid-monthly analysis update shows a single-day extent value for Figure 1, rather than the usual monthly average. While monthly average extent images are more accurate in understanding long-term changes, the daily images are helpful in monitoring sea ice conditions in near-real time.

map from space showing sea ice extent, continentsFigure 1. Daily Arctic sea ice extent on August 17, 2009, was 6.26 million km² (2.42 million sq. miles). The orange line shows the 1979-2000 median extent for that day. The black cross indicates the geographic North Pole. Sea Ice Index data. About the data. —Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center. High-resolution image

Overview of conditions

On August 17, 2009, Arctic sea ice extent was 6.26 million km² (2.42 million sq. miles). This is 960,000 km² (370,000 sq. miles) more ice than for the same day in 2007, and 1.37 million km² (530,000 sq. miles) below the 1979-2000 average. On August 8, the 2009 extent decreased below the 1979-2000 average minimum annual extent, with a month of melt still remaining.

graph with months on x axis and extent on y axis Figure 2. The graph above shows daily sea ice extent as of August 17, 2009. The solid light blue line indicates 2009; the solid dark blue line shows 2008; the dashed green line shows 2007; and the solid gray line indicates average extent from 1979 to 2000. The gray area around the average line shows the two standard deviation range of the data. Sea Ice Index data. —Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center. High-resolution image

Conditions in context

From August 1 to 17, Arctic sea ice extent declined at an average rate of 54,000 km² (21,000 sq. miles) per day. This decline was slower than the same period in 2008, when it was 91,000 km² (35,000 sq. miles) per day, and for the same period in 2007, when ice extent declined at a rate of 84,000 km² (32,000 sq. miles) per day. The recent rate of ice loss has slowed considerably compared to most of July. Arctic sea ice extent is now greater than the same day in 2008.

average monthly data from 1979-2009 for July Figure 3. Sea ice motion, derived from AMSR-E data and averaged for June, July, and the first week of August 2009 (the most recent data available), shows a recent change, with ice motion towards the eastern Siberian coast and little export of ice out of the Arctic Ocean via Fram Strait. —Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center. High-resolution image

Ice motion changes in August

A recent atmospheric circulation pattern, which led to a change in ice motion, caused the ice loss rate to slow down significantly in the first two weeks of August. As discussed in the August 4 post, during much of June and July, a strong Beaufort Sea high-pressure pattern promoted winds that helped push ice out of the Siberian coastal seas, and also brought clear skies and warm temperatures that helped induce melt.

Toward the end of July, the atmospheric pattern changed. Averaged over the past two weeks, a high-pressure system has been centered over the Barents Sea, with low pressure centered over the Laptev Sea. In accordance with Buys Ballot's Law, this pattern led to winds that redirected the motion of the ice cover, pushing the ice edge outward toward the Siberian coast and discouraging ice from exiting the Arctic Ocean through Fram Strait.

map of arctic showing sea level pressure and atmospheric circulation patterns Figure 4. The map of sea ice concentration from AMSR-E from August 16, 2009, shows ice clogging many of the channels of the Canadian Archipelago. The Northern Sea Route may be clear in the next few weeks. NASA AMSR-E data. —Credit: From National Snow and Ice Data Center, courtesy IUP, University of Bremen, Germany. High-resolution image

The Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route

So far this year, neither the Northwest Passage nor the Northern Sea Route has opened. The Northern Sea Route appears likely to open soon, but ice still clogs many of the channels in the Northwest Passage.

Whether or not the navigational passages through the Arctic Ocean will open in a given summer depends on atmospheric circulation and ice thickness. For example, although 2007 was a record low extent in the Arctic and the Northwest Passage was nearly completely open, the Northern Sea Route was still choked with ice because of a circulation pattern that pushed a tongue of ice against the Siberian coast. Recent research by Stephen Howell at the University of Waterloo in Canada shows that whether the Northwest Passage clears depends less on how much melt occurs, and more on whether multi-year sea ice is pushed into the channels. Counterintuitively, as the ice cover thins, ice may flow more easily into the channels, preventing the Northwest Passage from regularly opening in coming decades.

ice thickness from submarinesFigure 4. The map of sea level pressure (in millibars) from June and July 2009 shows a strong high-pressure cell over the Beaufort Sea, similar to the pattern in 2007. In the past, such patterns were rare. —Credit: From National Snow and Ice Data Center, courtesy NOAA/ESRL Physical Sciences Division. High-resolution image

Comment on atmospheric circulation patterns

James Overland of the NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle, Washington, has taken a close look at patterns of atmospheric circulation in recent summers. Overland notes that the periods June through August 2007 and June and July 2009 both saw an unusual atmospheric pattern of sea level pressure, with higher pressure on the Alaskan side of the Arctic and lower pressure on the Eurasian side. This pressure difference brought warm air into the central Arctic and transported sea ice towards the Atlantic. Historically, such a pattern is a rare event—before 2007, it only occurred twice in 30 years. Normally, there is little difference in pressure across the Arctic during summer, and winds are slack.

This rare condition may result from the convergence of the three main patterns of climate variability: the Arctic Oscillation (AO) climate pattern, which features either high or low pressure over most of the Arctic; the positive phase of the Pacific North American (PNA) pattern, which is characterized by low pressure over the Bering Sea and high pressure over the Canadian Rockies; and the Arctic dipole pattern, which features high pressure on one side of the Arctic and low pressure on the other. In 2007 and 2009 all three patterns have been in play. A clue to the cause of these unusual conditions comes from the wind flow in the middle atmosphere. Normally winds flow in a counter-clockwise direction around the central Arctic Ocean, a flow known as the polar vortex. In the summers of 2007 and 2009 the polar vortex shifted to mostly to the Eurasian side of the Arctic, allowing higher pressures to develop on the Alaskan side. Scientists are now studying whether this dipole pattern will become more common in the future and whether the loss of summer sea ice itself is helping to make this pattern more frequent.

References

Howell, S. E. L., C. R. Duguay, & T. Markus. 2009. Sea ice conditions and melt season duration variability within the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: 1979–2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10502; doi: 10.1029/2009GL037681.

Overland, J. E., & M. Wang. 2005. The third Arctic climate pattern: 1930s and early 2000s. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(23), L23808; doi: 10.1029/2005GL024254.

Wang, M., N. A. Bond, & J. E. Overland. 2007. Comparison of atmospheric forcing in four sub-arctic seas. Deep-Sea Research II, 54, 2543-2559; doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.08.014